My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
pidgey
Senior Boarder
Posts: 41
graphgraph
User Offline
 
He says the answer is safety belts but i say stop the criminal coddling and lock up speeders and drunk drivers.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7589256/

2004 traffic death rate lowest ever recorded But it's still a 'national epidemic,' Mineta saysThe Associated Press

Updated: 1:45 p.m. ET April 21, 2005WASHINGTON -

The rate dropped even as the total number of traffic deaths inched up because more drivers were on the road, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said.

Overall, 42,800 people died on the nation’s highways in 2004, up from 42,643 in 2003.

At the same time, people drove more miles, so the fatality rate dropped a bit, from 1.48 deaths per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 2003 to 1.46 deaths in 2004. That’s the lowest since records were first kept in 1966, NHTSA said.

Alcohol-related fatalities slid 2.1 percent last year, to 16,654 in 2004.

Reporting the mixed results, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta said the nation was “in the midst of a national epidemic” and urged motorists to buckle up.

“If this many people were to die from any one disease in a single year, Americans would demand a vaccine,” Mineta said. “The irony is we already have the best vaccine available to reduce the death toll on our highways — safety belts.”

Fifty-six percent of those killed weren’t wearing seat belts, a rate unchanged from 2003.

Deaths of drivers and passengers in sport utility vehicle rose 4.9 percent, though it was not clear how many more SUVs were on the road last year.

The number of deaths dropped 2.4 percent for people in passenger cars and fell 2 percent for pickup trucks.

In 2004, there were more vehicles registered — 235.4 million — and they drove more miles — 2.92 trillion.

Fatal crashes involving drivers between the ages of 16 to 20 increased slightly, from 7,353 in 2003 to 7,405.

The figures predicted the seventh straight increase for motorcycle fatalities. In 2004, 3,927 motorcyclists died, an increase of 7.3 percent over 2003.

The data released Thursday are considered projections. NHTSA plans to release final 2004 fatality figures in August. NHTSA collects crash statistics from all 50 states.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Impium Orexis
Junior Boarder
Posts: 20
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Oh yeah, plonk.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
army_doc7037203
Junior Boarder
Posts: 37
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Sounds like typical NHTSA hysteria and fear mongering to me.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
soniaj
Junior Boarder
Posts: 36
graphgraph
User Offline
 
I suspect expressways/highways (limited access) have fewer accidents per mile driven, but this is offset by more fatalities per accident. OTOH, I suspect non-expressway driving has more accidents but fewer fatalities per
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
de_vogon
Junior Boarder
Posts: 33
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Not to mention safer roads and vehicles, better and faster medical treatment. Speeders won't admit it, but those improvements since the 70's have a lot to do with the lower fatality rate on US highways despite higher and higher speeds. They also don't want to talk about overall crash numbers, just fatality rates.

John Lansford, PE
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
SonnyYambars
Junior Boarder
Posts: 34
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Please don't feed the troll.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
angel11
Junior Boarder
Posts: 25
graphgraph
User Offline
 
And crash rates (they've been going down as well). Have you ever wondered why most statistics are discussed in terms of rates (e.g., birth rate) rather than absolute numbers?
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 3 Weeks ago
Stevo_Devo
Junior Boarder
Posts: 35
graphgraph
User Offline
 
It makes much more sense to discuss per capita rates than VMT or PMT rates. The decrease in fatalities per VMT and PMT reflect more on people commuting greater distances than an increase in safety.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
de_vogon
Junior Boarder
Posts: 33
graphgraph
User Offline
 
OK, let's try it your way.

2003: 42,643 fatals/196 million licensed drivers (FHWA cite)

this is 1 crash fatality per 4596 licensed drivers

2004: 42,800 fatals/197 million licensed drivers (estimated)

this is 1 crash fatality per 4602 licensed drivers

Still a small rate decline from 2003 to 2004, and in 2004 those licensed drivers exposed themselves to traffic a little more than they did in 2003. Fairly stable rate, I'd say, even though the number is tragic for all of us, especially those who have lost friends or family in a crash.

Rick Powell IDOT District 3
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
Richard0802
Junior Boarder
Posts: 31
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Actually, they are 9.99 per seat belt at my store.

the percentage is 33 in my fleet.

Nope, hard to feel bad about someone who did put on the seat belt, I installed a set on my 62 scout, along with the leather buckets from a Mercur Scorpio, all it took to put in belts was a big bolt, and two washers, boom. lap belts.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 6 Months, 2 Weeks ago
johndippel
Junior Boarder
Posts: 26
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Well, it is actually only tragic for those of you who really did lose a family or friend to a vehicular accident, for the rest of us it is just numbers, huh?
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Nov 2008 The Republicans Online